Image Image Image Image Image

User access:

Scroll to Top

To Top


On 16, Feb 2012 | No Comments | In | By admin

Yick Wo and the Equal Protection Clause

Watch Free Online Visit Project Website


We don’t know a lot about Yick Wo. We’re not even sure that was his name. But it was the name of the laundry business he owned in San Francisco in the late 19th century. And it was the name listed on a Supreme Court decision that forever changed American law.

In 1880, the city of San Francisco passed a health and safety ordinance: All laundries in wooden buildings had to get the approval of the Board of Supervisors in order to obtain a license. The law, on its face, didn’t single out the Chinese. But when it was applied, every Chinese laundry owner in the city was denied a permit – and every white-owned laundry was granted a permit. Yick Wo challenged the ordinance, taking his case all the way to the Supreme Court.

“The holding of Yick Wo,” Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy says in the film, “was that a law that’s administered with an evil eye or an unequal hand violates your right to equal protection.”

Yick Wo and Civil Liberties examines the story of an unlikely Constitutional hero and the extraordinary impact the ruling in his case has had on how we see the Constitution today.


  • AMCP Platinum Hermes Creative Award

    Best Documentary Short – DC Asian Pacific American Festival

    Best Editing (Short Documentary) – Los Angeles International Film Festival

    Best Short Film – Show Me Social Justice Film Festival

    Bronze Telly Award

    CINE Golden Eagle

    CINE Masters Series Award

    CINE Special Jury Award

    Gold Camera – US International Film and Video Festival

    Honorable Mention – Columbus International Film + Video Festival

    Silver Hugo Award

    Third Place (Short Documentary) – Los Angeles International Film Festival

  • Yick Wo refused to shut down his business and was arrested. He fought his case from behind bars. He took it all the way to the Supreme Court.

    The Supreme Court determined that the ordinance was unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause – because of the unequal application of the law. It was the very first Supreme Court case to use this standard – and it did so almost 80 years before the Court’s landmark rulings striking down Jim Crow statutes enacted in the segregationist South.

    But that wasn’t the only precedent set by this remarkable case. Yick Wo was not an American citizen – because by law he wasn’t allowed to be. Yet the Court ruled that his rights were still protected by the 14th Amendment because it says that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” It does not limit that protection only to citizens.

    Since the case was decided in 1886, the decision has been cited in more than 160 opinions in the Supreme Court alone.

  • Producer, Writer and Narrator, Robe Imbriano

    Field Producer, Carla Denly

    Associate Producer, Sandra McDaniel

    Editor, Marc Tidalgo

    Graphics Animators, Hiroaki Sasa and Victoria Nece

    Camera, Dave Dellaria, Brett Wiley and Edward Marritz

    Production Associate, Gregory Blanc

    Research, María E. Matasar-Padilla

    Supervising Producer, Christina Lowery

    Sound, Dave Baum, Brian Buckley and Mark Mandler

    Music, Ben Decter and Gavin Allen

    Interns, Hannah Dillon, Mimi Giboin, Yvonne Liu and Mel Zahnd

    Senior Producer, Kayce Freed Jennings

    Executive Producer, Tom Yellin